Troubleshooting & Technical Questions & Modifications Have technical or modification questions about the Crossfire? Find out the answer, or give advice in here!

181mm vs. 185mm

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 20, 2014 | 06:35 AM
  #1 (permalink)  
Mr. Max's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 916
Likes: 1
From: Pasadena California
Default 181mm vs. 185mm

I've read a lot the threads, but there are so many of them, help me out here. I would really like a 185 pulley, but there seem to be complications like injectors not quite large enough, heating problems, and of course the idler bearing. I don't drag race or sustain high speeds for a long period but I do like to accelerate. Has anyone run one of these without having to change the inter-cooler or other mods. Does the ECU RETARD (ign.)YOUR GAIN IN BOOST AWAY? or any other problems like A/F. I know the upgraded bearing is a must. How about the 181mm? Jeff

P.S. I presently have a Code3 and a Needwings style CAI. Also it seems a lot of pulley suppliers are no longer around. I can only find Eurocharged Performance. Thanks
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2014 | 07:45 PM
  #2 (permalink)  
SRT6_Roadster's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Default Re: 181mm vs. 185mm

I have no fueling issues with fueling and my 185mm pulley. My car has seen both the drag strip and the track.
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2014 | 08:55 PM
  #3 (permalink)  
Mr. Max's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 916
Likes: 1
From: Pasadena California
Default Re: 181mm vs. 185mm

Originally Posted by SRT6_Roadster
I have no fueling issues with fueling and my 185mm pulley. My car has seen both the drag strip and the track.
Thank you very much. I appreciate the reply SRT6-Roadster. Mine's a drop top too. Did you know that they made less than a thousand of the SRT6 roadsters. Nine hundred and something worldwide. I tell people that it has all the earmarks of a collector car but that probably won't happen until after I'm dead.
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2014 | 08:59 PM
  #4 (permalink)  
tighed1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,741
Likes: 98
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Default Re: 181mm vs. 185mm

No issues here either Max.

Coupe stacked 181mm crank & Code 3 on SC
Roadster 192mm crank

AFR meters in both. No fuel mods other than generic tunes on both.
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2014 | 09:48 PM
  #5 (permalink)  
boostmonkey's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tighed1
No issues here either Max.

Coupe stacked 181mm crank & Code 3 on SC
Roadster 192mm crank

AFR meters in both. No fuel mods other than generic tunes on both.
That is surprising! Good to know.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2014 | 02:57 AM
  #6 (permalink)  
Mr. Max's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 916
Likes: 1
From: Pasadena California
Default Re: 181mm vs. 185mm

Originally Posted by tighed1
No issues here either Max.

Coupe stacked 181mm crank & Code 3 on SC
Roadster 192mm crank

AFR meters in both. No fuel mods other than generic tunes on both.
Holy Crap! 192mm. Since I already have a Code 3, I could do that. How much boost are you reading? Is this a daily driver or pretty much a track car. From your DIY'S it looks like you're running a Super Cooler too. I sometimes drive this thing through the desert going from L.A. to Tucson or Vegas. I like your pump mod too.

Thank you tighed 1. My car comes off it's extended warranty next year and it's time to mod it up. I plan things early, especially when I see the vendors disappearing. Maybe I just haven't looked hard enough for them. Any recommendations would be welcome. Jeff
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2014 | 10:26 AM
  #7 (permalink)  
boostmonkey's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Default Re: 181mm vs. 185mm

The 192 pulley with 24% supercharger overdrive falls in between the 185 or 62 (20%) and stacked 178/EC-65 (32%).

The 181 and C3 stacked overdrive the supercharger 33%. That's the most I've heard of anybody runnning and just a litttle more than a 178/EC 65 stack (32%).

See the attachment for more fun numbers. The pulley ratio calculations are legit and based upon the diameters I've gleaned from this forum. HP estimates are based upon my own unscientific formulas.
 
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
pulley ratios.jpg (157.2 KB, 93 views)
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2014 | 03:31 PM
  #8 (permalink)  
Mr. Max's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 916
Likes: 1
From: Pasadena California
Default Re: 181mm vs. 185mm

Originally Posted by boostmonkey
The 192 pulley with 24% supercharger overdrive falls in between the 185 or 62 (20%) and stacked 178/EC-65 (32%).

The 181 and C3 stacked overdrive the supercharger 33%. That's the most I've heard of anybody runnning and just a litttle more than a 178/EC 65 stack (32%).

See the attachment for more fun numbers. The pulley ratio calculations are legit and based upon the diameters I've gleaned from this forum. HP estimates are based upon my own unscientific formulas.
Thanks boostmonkey.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2014 | 11:25 PM
  #9 (permalink)  
JEFASOLD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,709
Likes: 10
Default Re: 181mm vs. 185mm

While I can only attest to a 181 mm pulley, myself and several others found the A/F ratio to be running a little lean at the top and needed some mod to the fuel system. I personally added the SL55 pump and the free flow filter and adjustable regulator from NW and a modified fuel rail. Some have gone with larger injectors but as I understand it, this required some retuning. I would be curious to know if those who had no issue with stacked setups or 185 mm pulleys are using the Zeitronic meter and can verify good A/F ratios at the top.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 04:23 AM
  #10 (permalink)  
Mr. Max's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 916
Likes: 1
From: Pasadena California
Default Re: 181mm vs. 185mm

Originally Posted by JEFASOLD
While I can only attest to a 181 mm pulley, myself and several others found the A/F ratio to be running a little lean at the top and needed some mod to the fuel system. I personally added the SL55 pump and the free flow filter and adjustable regulator from NW and a modified fuel rail. Some have gone with larger injectors but as I understand it, this required some retuning. I would be curious to know if those who had no issue with stacked setups or 185 mm pulleys are using the Zeitronic meter and can verify good A/F ratios at the top.
Thanks Jim
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 08:33 AM
  #11 (permalink)  
oledoc2u's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,605
Likes: 38
From: IN
Default Re: 181mm vs. 185mm

Well....everyone of these motors must be different with all the different responses. I can only hope you are monitoring your runs to see the real world. Let me put it to you this way. A long sustained run on a nice straight desert road....or several all out passes down the 1/4 mile, will over time take it's toll. On a lot things for sure, but lien conditions create heat like it or not. Better to be on the safe side and make sure you are delivering enough fuel. I can tell you all for certain my 62mm ran lien and needed more fuel. I can tell you for certain my roadster falls short of the 1/4 mile needing more with a 65mm. The roadster runs 12 flat all day long, but with the new tune I just put in her, she should break into the high 11's. The coupe has yet to see the track, but I already know she's faster than the roadster... Just play safe, or it could be at least $3K mistake if you can find a motor.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 10:17 AM
  #12 (permalink)  
tighed1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,741
Likes: 98
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Default Re: 181mm vs. 185mm

Originally Posted by oledoc2u
.... A long sustained run on a nice straight desert road....or several all out passes down the 1/4 mile, will over time take it's toll..
This was true in my case. Don't know if anyone recalls but I did a sustained high speed run (100-145) over a 20 or so mile distance and had my SC seize up. I was running the same stacked setup that I am running today. Around town I don't have the opportunity (small town) for extended runs. Out of town I know better NOT to do it!
Lesson learned.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 12:33 PM
  #13 (permalink)  
JEFASOLD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,709
Likes: 10
Default Re: 181mm vs. 185mm

Originally Posted by tighed1
This was true in my case. Don't know if anyone recalls but I did a sustained high speed run (100-145) over a 20 or so mile distance and had my SC seize up. I was running the same stacked setup that I am running today. Around town I don't have the opportunity (small town) for extended runs. Out of town I know better NOT to do it!
Lesson learned.
So, with this scenario we can assume that they will run a bit lean at the high end, so some fuel delivery modification would be necessary to achieve ideal A/F ratios. Thanks Tighed for helping clear that up, it's too bad you had to learn that the hard way but again, some valuable info for those that follow. It's always tougher to lead.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 01:56 PM
  #14 (permalink)  
SparkieSRT6's Avatar
SSB SRT6 405hp/401Tq
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 4,097
Likes: 2
From: Hooterville
Default Re: 181mm vs. 185mm

Originally Posted by JEFASOLD
So, with this scenario we can assume that they will run a bit lean at the high end, so some fuel delivery modification would be necessary to achieve ideal A/F ratios. Thanks Tighed for helping clear that up, it's too bad you had to learn that the hard way but again, some valuable info for those that follow. It's always tougher to lead.


The SC seizure would not be caused by lean AFR's.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 02:20 PM
  #15 (permalink)  
tighed1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,741
Likes: 98
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Default Re: 181mm vs. 185mm

I'm sure it seized due to the excessive rpm's that the stacked configuration placed on the SC. The highway run wasn't a steady 100+ mph run. It was a constant get-on-it at high speeds (high RPMs) while encountering traffic. Slow down for then accelerate to get around slower traffic, then do it all over again for the next batch of traffic. It was a blast but as I found out very harmful to subject the SC to that much punishment without breaks to cool down and recover.

 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 02:55 PM
  #16 (permalink)  
BrianBrave's Avatar
<--- Huge Horsepower
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,217
Likes: 2
From: So Cal
Default Re: 181mm vs. 185mm

Been running my 185mm pulley since Feb 2008 - I also installed a larger HE around the same time. My dyno runs (at sea level) right after the install showed I was running rich - I had the SRT tuned at that time to optimum performance with the stock fuel injectors, fuel rail and fuel pump.

The only issue I had was the smaller idler pulley that came with the kit gave way (along with the OEM belt) around 5K miles after the install.

I re-installed the larger OEM idler pulley and went with a larger Gates Belt and I've never had a problem since. (45K miles)

I don't race but my car has been subjected to the Texas Mile, high speed desert runs (+160 mph) and hard core canyon runs (hard on the gas / hard on the brakes).

I think the 185 is great for highway driving as it gives a huge shot of instant boost to blow by cars and have some fun in the curves.

Can't rate it for the 1/4 mile racing.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 04:01 PM
  #17 (permalink)  
Mr. Max's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 916
Likes: 1
From: Pasadena California
Default Re: 181mm vs. 185mm

Great Info.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 04:21 PM
  #18 (permalink)  
oledoc2u's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,605
Likes: 38
From: IN
Default Re: 181mm vs. 185mm

Originally Posted by JEFASOLD
So, with this scenario we can assume that they will run a bit lean at the high end, so some fuel delivery modification would be necessary to achieve ideal A/F ratios. Thanks Tighed for helping clear that up, it's too bad you had to learn that the hard way but again, some valuable info for those that follow. It's always tougher to lead.
Yeah thanks Tighed1...lol.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 04:28 PM
  #19 (permalink)  
oledoc2u's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,605
Likes: 38
From: IN
Default Re: 181mm vs. 185mm

Originally Posted by BrianBrave
Been running my 185mm pulley since Feb 2008 - I also installed a larger HE around the same time. My dyno runs (at sea level) right after the install showed I was running rich - I had the SRT tuned at that time to optimum performance with the stock fuel injectors, fuel rail and fuel pump.

The only issue I had was the smaller idler pulley that came with the kit gave way (along with the OEM belt) around 5K miles after the install.

I re-installed the larger OEM idler pulley and went with a larger Gates Belt and I've never had a problem since. (45K miles)

I don't race but my car has been subjected to the Texas Mile, high speed desert runs (+160 mph) and hard core canyon runs (hard on the gas / hard on the brakes).

I think the 185 is great for highway driving as it gives a huge shot of instant boost to blow by cars and have some fun in the curves.

Can't rate it for the 1/4 mile racing.
Running a Texas mile is no worse than running several 1/4 mi runs. But I can assure you unless you have one of those motors I mentioned, it will run lien on a sustained run. How many runs? Only time will tell. But I bet you don't run like that everyday or for long distances. If I am wrong, then you are lucky. The motors are built well, but they are all a little different. More fuel solved my lien issues. A tune can solve them as well, so yours may be tuned to the rich side. The fine line is tuning to run right at the line between lien and rich...and that line is hard to find without a great tuner.
 
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2014 | 12:53 AM
  #20 (permalink)  
JEFASOLD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,709
Likes: 10
Default Re: 181mm vs. 185mm

Originally Posted by oledoc2u
Running a Texas mile is no worse than running several 1/4 mi runs. But I can assure you unless you have one of those motors I mentioned, it will run lien on a sustained run. How many runs? Only time will tell. But I bet you don't run like that everyday or for long distances. If I am wrong, then you are lucky. The motors are built well, but they are all a little different. More fuel solved my lien issues. A tune can solve them as well, so yours may be tuned to the rich side. The fine line is tuning to run right at the line between lien and rich...and that line is hard to find without a great tuner.
A Zeitronic A/F ratio meter can help in that regard. You can inform your tuner what you are seeing and can get a retune to get you close to the ideal. It will take some effort but it is worth it to keep your motor from self destructing.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xfireohio
Cars For Sale - Archive
10
Jul 20, 2020 12:03 AM
Dementors
Crossfire SRT6
12
Oct 9, 2015 07:22 PM
AlbertFattal
Exterior & Lighting
3
Sep 24, 2015 05:03 AM
Zoodust
Crossfire SRT6
1
Aug 21, 2015 10:39 AM
Forza1
Crossfire SRT6
71
Jul 28, 2011 11:30 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:43 PM.