TTTTToast
Originally Posted by Bullseye
I got one thing to say, that was of course after I regained my sight back after looking at that 1st girl. Someone please tell her she is not in her 20's anymore :lol: I sprayed some mace in my eyes to stop the pain. I mean dang! Naaaasty I'm suprised the camera stayed together to take that pic. I would have burned that pic not posted it :lol:
Originally Posted by x'ed
i think its because it has that new tranny (no not the one in the pic.) that has like that direct shift thing, two clutches or some crap when the <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=car&v=56">car</a> gets the next gear spinning before you even shift, supposed to be real cool. also, there are those that just <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=love&v=56">love</a> low end torque. but im with bullseye, i more or less got the crossfire because im only paying 299 a month, needed a new <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=car&v=56">car</a> and thats about what id be paying for a 20 thoushand dollar <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=car&v=56">car</a>. i also <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=love&v=56">love</a> the way it handeled, it had decent power and i think its top 5 in looks. im comin out of a grand cherokee as a daily driver (ran a 14.2, total sleeper) and a 350 whp 1979 rx7 with a series II second gen turbo II rx7 motor and tranyy, t04 turbo, stanalone ecu, <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=ford&v=56">ford</a> 9" rear end, disc brakes all the way around, roll cage, front mount ic custom exhaust and on on on on on , probably could have bought a much nicer <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=car&v=56">car</a>, but it was fun. now i put put along with 215 <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=hp&v=56">hp</a>, but im trying to fix that (anyone say nos).
Originally Posted by Heb80
Originally Posted by Bullseye
I got one thing to say, that was of course after I regained my sight back after looking at that 1st girl. Someone please tell her she is not in her 20's anymore :lol: I sprayed some mace in my eyes to stop the pain. I mean dang! Naaaasty I'm suprised the <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=camera&v=56">camera</a> stayed together to take that pic. I would have burned that pic not posted it :lol:
"qoute X'ed"i think its because it has that new tranny (no not the one in the pic.) i just got that now lol i guess im not as quick as i once was. :lol:
"I love the xf like one wise man said its 50 hp short of stardom. SO is the TT imo."
I would agree with that, hence the chip and pipes. My car is now running at around 280hp. I read that Kleeman stuff costs around $10k. I would be at 480+hp if I dumped that much cash into my car. I'm saving up for it already :wink:
I would agree with that, hence the chip and pipes. My car is now running at around 280hp. I read that Kleeman stuff costs around $10k. I would be at 480+hp if I dumped that much cash into my car. I'm saving up for it already :wink:
Originally Posted by x'ed
there we go, now were getting constructive, almost the evidence ive asked for.
I can tell you that when my car was completely stock, I ran it in one autocross, before I started modding it. I came in 3rd behind a S2000 on sticky tires and I can't remeber what the other car was, but it was definately a light RWD car. The crossfire wasn't out 2 years ago, so I dont have any comparision, but maybe one will show up at an event soon. I was only .3 off the S2000 though. Our layouts are usually pretty high speed courses, taking the advantage from the RWD crowd.
I would like to see a real world driver comparision on a Road track, that tells more than what a car can do in a parking lot :wink:
I will admit that the TT brakes stop well for the first 2 times, then I usually get some Fade starting in.
Originally Posted by Power5
Originally Posted by x'ed
there we go, now were getting constructive, almost the evidence ive asked for.
I can tell you that when my <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=car&v=56">car</a> was completely <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=stock&v=56">stock</a>, I ran it in one autocross, before I started modding it. I came in 3rd behind a S2000 on sticky tires and I can't remeber what the other <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=car&v=56">car</a> was, but it was definately a light RWD <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=car&v=56">car</a>. The crossfire wasn't out 2 years ago, so I dont have any comparision, but maybe one will show up at an event soon. I was only .3 off the S2000 though. Our layouts are usually pretty high speed courses, taking the advantage from the RWD crowd.
I would like to see a real world driver comparision on a Road track, that tells more than what a <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=car&v=56">car</a> can do in a parking lot :wink:
I will admit that the TT brakes stop well for the first 2 times, then I usually get some Fade starting in.
Originally Posted by x'ed
no <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=people&v=56">people</a> were saying the ran 14.1 second quarters <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=stock&v=56">stock</a>, i wanted to see those slips, but your slips are very impress. oh yeah, our <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=car&v=56">car</a> brakes amazingly, like z06 type numbers.
Even my old mach 1 matched the crossfire 60mph-0 stopping test. Gotta love brembos.
From motortrend the mach1 and the crossfire both came to a stop from 60 in 117 if remember correctly. And the z06 did it in 107 or 108 it was under 110. And the vortech mach 1 ran the quater in 11.8@117 slolomed at over 69 mph think it was 69.7 pulled way over .90 g's and had one short *** stopping distance. OH 0-60 was 3.8. Just some useless info for everyone to absorb.
Originally Posted by Dan Root
Just for you tt gals there isn't any tts' challenging on the west coast.See yah unless I smell you first !!


