Crossfire Coupe A place to discuss Coupe specific topics.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

N/A performance stats

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 14, 2012 | 10:25 AM
  #21 (permalink)  
redliner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Saint Augustine FL
Default Re: N/A performance stats

Originally Posted by +fireamx
It's all It took to make my car ack like a normal car. It never kicks in if the rear tires break lose, it hasn't gone into limp mode even once for any reason.
Of course it doesn't give you posi traction, but you never had that to begin with,
same here only limp mode with it fully on, i can spin a decent amount by just turning the button off and a pretty good chirp into second without the tc on (at least with old tires)

and the clock starts on green so yes your rt does add to your time
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 01:53 PM
  #22 (permalink)  
Jackerman's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Default Re: N/A performance stats

Originally Posted by +fireamx
Just follow the guy that beats you.
Thanks for the encouraging words lol
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 02:26 PM
  #23 (permalink)  
john book's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 903
Likes: 1
Default Re: N/A performance stats

Originally Posted by +fireamx
Just follow the guy that beats you.
This quote is still making me smile!!!!I have accepted the N/A Crossfire for what it is and a neck snapping tire smoking push you in the back of the seat car it is not. It does everything else very well.
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2012 | 01:01 PM
  #24 (permalink)  
zx3speed's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Default Re: N/A performance stats

I tried dynomaster for android. Gave me a 15.xx 1/4 mile. My best at the track was a 15.2x. Fairly accurate I guess.
 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2012 | 01:42 AM
  #25 (permalink)  
rayth's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 3
From: Littleton, MA
Default Re: N/A performance stats

Does 14.08 sound at all feasible for a stock six speed?
 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2012 | 06:02 AM
  #26 (permalink)  
boostmonkey's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Default Re: N/A performance stats

The 1/4 time on your timeslip is measured from when the cars leaves the 2nd staging beam until breaking the 1320 beam. Your reaction time is definitely not included in that number.
 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2012 | 11:51 AM
  #27 (permalink)  
Abaton6's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: Hartland, Vermont
Default Re: N/A performance stats

I used to run at New England dragway. Every week it would come down to me, and another guy in our bracket. EVERY week he beat my time, and EVERY week I would take the trophy. His reaction time was just too slow. Pissed him off bigtime.

Originally Posted by boostmonkey
The 1/4 time on your timeslip is measured from when the cars leaves the 2nd staging beam until breaking the 1320 beam. Your reaction time is definitely not included in that number.
 
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2012 | 01:51 PM
  #28 (permalink)  
boostmonkey's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Default Re: N/A performance stats

Originally Posted by Abaton6
I used to run at New England dragway. Every week it would come down to me, and another guy in our bracket. EVERY week he beat my time, and EVERY week I would take the trophy. His reaction time was just too slow. Pissed him off bigtime.
Nice!

Sounds like fun.
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 06:18 PM
  #29 (permalink)  
xman03's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rayth
Does 14.08 sound at all feasible for a stock six speed?
Not at all, that's what a stock s2000 runs @ 101mph and it has 240hp (210whp) and weighs 2800lbs. Stock NA has a worse power to weight ratio than an RSX-S and there is no way an RSX would trap anywhere close to 100mph. Even Evo X traps under 100.
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 06:41 PM
  #30 (permalink)  
gunner1374's Avatar
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Default Re: N/A performance stats

The problem is in getting the 60 ft time down with the single tire takeoff. The good thing about the 6spd is the quick launch gear. With good throttle and clutch control, sub 2 sec 60 ft times are possible. That and shifting the correct RPM with a quick shift, can net a low 14. My best was 14.2.
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 11:46 PM
  #31 (permalink)  
xman03's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gunner1374
The problem is in getting the 60 ft time down with the single tire takeoff. The good thing about the 6spd is the quick launch gear. With good throttle and clutch control, sub 2 sec 60 ft times are possible. That and shifting the correct RPM with a quick shift, can net a low 14. My best was 14.2.
What mods?
 
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2012 | 09:18 AM
  #32 (permalink)  
Beaner's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,175
Likes: 16
From: Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada
Default Re: N/A performance stats

bluecoupe ran a 15 flat with a stock auto crossfire. Just could not get into the 14's that night.
 
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2012 | 09:40 AM
  #33 (permalink)  
gunner1374's Avatar
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Default Re: N/A performance stats

Originally Posted by xman03
What mods?
Rear cats deleted, higher flow dual exhaust, k&n filters, maf debur and elbow debaffle, new plugs and wires, traction off. Thats it. My buddy brought his 03 Mustang GT down the same night. He has rear cat delete, duals w/ flow super40s, x-pipe, 5 spd, CAI. He was upset when I beat him 4 for 4, but, in his defense, he was having a hard time with traction. I tried in his car and could barely get in the 15s and he was running high 14s, lol. On the street, I can get the little crossfire, with perfect shifts, to briefly spin tires into second and chirp into third at roughly 50mph. It does lack the power that I am used to, but runs out pretty well for a six cylinder. I still like the car. Hoping to do a Eurotune and 74mm tb/ elbow soon. Maybe make a CAI setup for it as well and underdrives. Should break 13s with those???
 
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2012 | 10:58 AM
  #34 (permalink)  
xman03's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gunner1374
Rear cats deleted, higher flow dual exhaust, k&n filters, maf debur and elbow debaffle, new plugs and wires, traction off. Thats it. My buddy brought his 03 Mustang GT down the same night. He has rear cat delete, duals w/ flow super40s, x-pipe, 5 spd, CAI. He was upset when I beat him 4 for 4, but, in his defense, he was having a hard time with traction. I tried in his car and could barely get in the 15s and he was running high 14s, lol. On the street, I can get the little crossfire, with perfect shifts, to briefly spin tires into second and chirp into third at roughly 50mph. It does lack the power that I am used to, but runs out pretty well for a six cylinder. I still like the car. Hoping to do a Eurotune and 74mm tb/ elbow soon. Maybe make a CAI setup for it as well and underdrives. Should break 13s with those???
You should be able to, what do you trap at right now? You would need to trap around 103-104mph to hit 13s. Your buddy must suck at driving lol, 03 stock GT should run around 14.2 and with those mods it's easily a 13s car. Ever thought of ditching your passenger seat, weight makes a lot of different. I had an 02 RSX-S with a CAI, race header, cat back, and k-pro (fully tunable ecu which you can data log and tune real time via a laptop through the ecu USB port - most fun I ever had with a car ) and I gutted the rear/trunk.. Probably about 220whp from the stock of about 170whp.. Not bad for bolt-ons and ran 13.3 @ 106mph so weight makes a big difference, had my car weighed and it was only 2500lbs. On a side note I spanked an 8E S4 with bolt ons.. the v8 one with 344hp stock from a 50mph roll by a few bus length too 100mph something . The look on his face was priceless.. He was all looking over like wtf.. A crossfire? lol. All I have is a code 3 DIY intake mod as I just got my car a month ago.
 
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2012 | 12:43 PM
  #35 (permalink)  
+fireamx's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,509
Likes: 7
From: Akron, Ohio
Default Re: N/A performance stats

Flights of fancy from 4 years ago. As of today, nobody's done it yet.
Any takers?

https://www.crossfireforum.org/forum...n-xf-book.html

Maybe if everybody chipped in a buck or two as a grand prize for the first documented "video" of a "Stock" NA XF breaking into the 13's, it might give somebody some incentive.
 
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2012 | 01:27 PM
  #36 (permalink)  
boostmonkey's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Default Re: N/A performance stats

Dragtimes slips show stock NAs run low 15s, even high 14s on a good pass. The only ones I see that are into the 13s have nitrous.

I do not think a 1.99 60' is possible with a stock NA, even on a perfect launch. I could be proven wrong with a timeslip, but until then I'm going to say no. The car doesn't have the right gearing or torque for it.
 
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2012 | 01:31 PM
  #37 (permalink)  
boostmonkey's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Default Re: N/A performance stats

Originally Posted by xman03
Not at all, that's what a stock s2000 runs @ 101mph and it has 240hp (210whp) and weighs 2800lbs. Stock NA has a worse power to weight ratio than an RSX-S and there is no way an RSX would trap anywhere close to 100mph. Even Evo X traps under 100.
Don't they have a forum for hondas... This forum is actually not about japaneses 4-banger econoboxes.
 
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2012 | 04:29 PM
  #38 (permalink)  
+fireamx's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,509
Likes: 7
From: Akron, Ohio
Default Re: N/A performance stats

Originally Posted by boostmonkey
Dragtimes slips show stock NAs run low 15s, even high 14s on a good pass. The only ones I see that are into the 13s have nitrous.

I do not think a 1.99 60' is possible with a stock NA, even on a perfect launch. I could be proven wrong with a timeslip, but until then I'm going to say no. The car doesn't have the right gearing or torque for it.
I tend to agree . 60' times under 2.0 sec's with a 3.27 gear and 215 H.P. is asking for a lot.
True, the manual transmissions have a really low 1st. gear, but I just don't think you could get a good enough hook up.
 
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2012 | 05:16 PM
  #39 (permalink)  
xman03's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by boostmonkey
Don't they have a forum for hondas... This forum is actually not about japaneses 4-banger econoboxes.
That 4-banger put out 110whp per liter, do the math of what NA does, pathetic that NA with bolt ons will never be as fast as a 2L RSX.. At least the Japanese got it right. Or throw a supercharger on an s2000 and no SRT would even come close to beating it, lets not be crossfire fanboys.
 
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2012 | 07:10 PM
  #40 (permalink)  
Beaner's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,175
Likes: 16
From: Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada
Default Re: N/A performance stats

Originally Posted by xman03
.... At least the Japanese got it right. Or throw a supercharger on an s2000 and no SRT would even come close to beating it, lets not be crossfire fanboys.
Nope, supercharged s2000 ran in the 13's with street tires, srt6 ran 12.9 with street tires. they are a close match. Take it easy with the honda is best attitude. they are all good for what they are built for

 

Last edited by Beaner; Nov 17, 2012 at 07:18 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:34 PM.