N/A performance stats
and the clock starts on green so yes your rt does add to your time
This quote is still making me smile!!!!I have accepted the N/A Crossfire for what it is and a neck snapping tire smoking push you in the back of the seat car it is not. It does everything else very well.
The 1/4 time on your timeslip is measured from when the cars leaves the 2nd staging beam until breaking the 1320 beam. Your reaction time is definitely not included in that number.
I used to run at New England dragway. Every week it would come down to me, and another guy in our bracket. EVERY week he beat my time, and EVERY week I would take the trophy. His reaction time was just too slow. Pissed him off bigtime. 
Sounds like fun.
Not at all, that's what a stock s2000 runs @ 101mph and it has 240hp (210whp) and weighs 2800lbs. Stock NA has a worse power to weight ratio than an RSX-S and there is no way an RSX would trap anywhere close to 100mph. Even Evo X traps under 100.
The problem is in getting the 60 ft time down with the single tire takeoff. The good thing about the 6spd is the quick launch gear. With good throttle and clutch control, sub 2 sec 60 ft times are possible. That and shifting the correct RPM with a quick shift, can net a low 14. My best was 14.2.
The problem is in getting the 60 ft time down with the single tire takeoff. The good thing about the 6spd is the quick launch gear. With good throttle and clutch control, sub 2 sec 60 ft times are possible. That and shifting the correct RPM with a quick shift, can net a low 14. My best was 14.2.
Rear cats deleted, higher flow dual exhaust, k&n filters, maf debur and elbow debaffle, new plugs and wires, traction off. Thats it. My buddy brought his 03 Mustang GT down the same night. He has rear cat delete, duals w/ flow super40s, x-pipe, 5 spd, CAI. He was upset when I beat him 4 for 4, but, in his defense, he was having a hard time with traction. I tried in his car and could barely get in the 15s and he was running high 14s, lol. On the street, I can get the little crossfire, with perfect shifts, to briefly spin tires into second and chirp into third at roughly 50mph. It does lack the power that I am used to, but runs out pretty well for a six cylinder. I still like the car. Hoping to do a Eurotune and 74mm tb/ elbow soon. Maybe make a CAI setup for it as well and underdrives. Should break 13s with those???
Rear cats deleted, higher flow dual exhaust, k&n filters, maf debur and elbow debaffle, new plugs and wires, traction off. Thats it. My buddy brought his 03 Mustang GT down the same night. He has rear cat delete, duals w/ flow super40s, x-pipe, 5 spd, CAI. He was upset when I beat him 4 for 4, but, in his defense, he was having a hard time with traction. I tried in his car and could barely get in the 15s and he was running high 14s, lol. On the street, I can get the little crossfire, with perfect shifts, to briefly spin tires into second and chirp into third at roughly 50mph. It does lack the power that I am used to, but runs out pretty well for a six cylinder. I still like the car. Hoping to do a Eurotune and 74mm tb/ elbow soon. Maybe make a CAI setup for it as well and underdrives. Should break 13s with those???
Flights of fancy from 4 years ago. As of today, nobody's done it yet.
Any takers?
https://www.crossfireforum.org/forum...n-xf-book.html
Maybe if everybody chipped in a buck or two as a grand prize for the first documented "video" of a "Stock" NA XF breaking into the 13's, it might give somebody some incentive.
Any takers?
https://www.crossfireforum.org/forum...n-xf-book.html
Maybe if everybody chipped in a buck or two as a grand prize for the first documented "video" of a "Stock" NA XF breaking into the 13's, it might give somebody some incentive.
Dragtimes slips show stock NAs run low 15s, even high 14s on a good pass. The only ones I see that are into the 13s have nitrous.
I do not think a 1.99 60' is possible with a stock NA, even on a perfect launch. I could be proven wrong with a timeslip, but until then I'm going to say no. The car doesn't have the right gearing or torque for it.
I do not think a 1.99 60' is possible with a stock NA, even on a perfect launch. I could be proven wrong with a timeslip, but until then I'm going to say no. The car doesn't have the right gearing or torque for it.
Don't they have a forum for hondas... This forum is actually not about japaneses 4-banger econoboxes.
Dragtimes slips show stock NAs run low 15s, even high 14s on a good pass. The only ones I see that are into the 13s have nitrous.
I do not think a 1.99 60' is possible with a stock NA, even on a perfect launch. I could be proven wrong with a timeslip, but until then I'm going to say no. The car doesn't have the right gearing or torque for it.
I do not think a 1.99 60' is possible with a stock NA, even on a perfect launch. I could be proven wrong with a timeslip, but until then I'm going to say no. The car doesn't have the right gearing or torque for it.
True, the manual transmissions have a really low 1st. gear, but I just don't think you could get a good enough hook up.
That 4-banger put out 110whp per liter, do the math of what NA does, pathetic that NA with bolt ons will never be as fast as a 2L RSX.. At least the Japanese got it right. Or throw a supercharger on an s2000 and no SRT would even come close to beating it, lets not be crossfire fanboys.
Last edited by Beaner; Nov 17, 2012 at 07:18 PM.



