datalogs LEAN AFR
datalogs LEAN AFR
I am hoping to get some feedback from those that have been through this and can help interpret what the AFR's mean during the rpm and boost cycles.
I thought I had AFR's after my first data log but it was only a 1st gear pull near my neighbor hood. After I got the Zeitronix wide band working again I decided to log on the way home today. I was able to get a couple of good runs in. A rolling start, a 0-80 mph and a 40-90 mph.
Max psi – 19.7
Lowest AFR – 9.6
Highest RPM (auto mode) – 6100
AFR’s are frighteningly low, even after let off when thereis no throttle or boost (actually opposite, there’s 23mmHg) the RPM’s are stillup but the AFR stays way too low for a while. The AFR’s don’t stay consistent they will go up to 10.5 or 11 on somepulls but stay down in the 9’s on others.
Mods - DCAI, 62mm SC pulley, boxed Euro charged tune, using 93octane and it was 85 degrees outside.
Is there a need to calculate duty cycle to keep the AFRup? Is it time for injectors, SL55 fuelpump, and looped fuel rail? Or just geta looped fuel rail with fuel sensor for the wideband and check fuel pressurewith wideband and datalogs before the pump?
Here is the rolling start
a3594f79-2873-44ee-80d1-87f11280fe1d_zps15366333.jpg
here is the 0-80 from 1st gear to 2nd
0-80pull1stadn2ndgear_zps412e92e5.jpg
here is the 40-90 from 3rd to 4th
50-90pull3rdto4th_zps385ea999.jpg
I thought I had AFR's after my first data log but it was only a 1st gear pull near my neighbor hood. After I got the Zeitronix wide band working again I decided to log on the way home today. I was able to get a couple of good runs in. A rolling start, a 0-80 mph and a 40-90 mph.
Max psi – 19.7
Lowest AFR – 9.6
Highest RPM (auto mode) – 6100
AFR’s are frighteningly low, even after let off when thereis no throttle or boost (actually opposite, there’s 23mmHg) the RPM’s are stillup but the AFR stays way too low for a while. The AFR’s don’t stay consistent they will go up to 10.5 or 11 on somepulls but stay down in the 9’s on others.
Mods - DCAI, 62mm SC pulley, boxed Euro charged tune, using 93octane and it was 85 degrees outside.
Is there a need to calculate duty cycle to keep the AFRup? Is it time for injectors, SL55 fuelpump, and looped fuel rail? Or just geta looped fuel rail with fuel sensor for the wideband and check fuel pressurewith wideband and datalogs before the pump?
Here is the rolling start
a3594f79-2873-44ee-80d1-87f11280fe1d_zps15366333.jpg
here is the 0-80 from 1st gear to 2nd
0-80pull1stadn2ndgear_zps412e92e5.jpg
here is the 40-90 from 3rd to 4th
50-90pull3rdto4th_zps385ea999.jpg
Re: datalogs LEAN AFR
I have AEM wideband and I am reading very lean. I am going to change my sensor. I have been told the sensors go out on them frequently. WOT I am reading 15-16. Cruising I am reading 14.7 perfect. If you find out information please let me know. I was also thinking about changing fuel pump & injections
Last edited by austinbarrylee; 09-18-2013 at 02:18 AM.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Age: 39
Posts: 6,349
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
11 Posts
Re: datalogs LEAN AFR
You guys do realize that
<11 = rich
>12 = lean... right?
Jesse -- 9.6 AFR is a bit fat, you can lean that out and recoup some horsepower. If you're at ~10.9 under WOT at max boost, that's about where you want to be based on my memory from Anthony's best tunes.
Austin -- AFR's in the 16's are DANGEROUSLY lean... like, meltdown area. Don't do another WOT pull until you get your tune sorted out.
<11 = rich
>12 = lean... right?
Jesse -- 9.6 AFR is a bit fat, you can lean that out and recoup some horsepower. If you're at ~10.9 under WOT at max boost, that's about where you want to be based on my memory from Anthony's best tunes.
Austin -- AFR's in the 16's are DANGEROUSLY lean... like, meltdown area. Don't do another WOT pull until you get your tune sorted out.
You guys do realize that
<11 = rich
>12 = lean... right?
Jesse -- 9.6 AFR is a bit fat, you can lean that out and recoup some horsepower. If you're at ~10.9 under WOT at max boost, that's about where you want to be based on my memory from Anthony's best tunes.
Austin -- AFR's in the 16's are DANGEROUSLY lean... like, meltdown area. Don't do another WOT pull until you get your tune sorted out.
<11 = rich
>12 = lean... right?
Jesse -- 9.6 AFR is a bit fat, you can lean that out and recoup some horsepower. If you're at ~10.9 under WOT at max boost, that's about where you want to be based on my memory from Anthony's best tunes.
Austin -- AFR's in the 16's are DANGEROUSLY lean... like, meltdown area. Don't do another WOT pull until you get your tune sorted out.
You guys do realize that
<11 = rich
>12 = lean... right?
Jesse -- 9.6 AFR is a bit fat, you can lean that out and recoup some horsepower. If you're at ~10.9 under WOT at max boost, that's about where you want to be based on my memory from Anthony's best tunes.
Austin -- AFR's in the 16's are DANGEROUSLY lean... like, meltdown area. Don't do another WOT pull until you get your tune sorted out.
<11 = rich
>12 = lean... right?
Jesse -- 9.6 AFR is a bit fat, you can lean that out and recoup some horsepower. If you're at ~10.9 under WOT at max boost, that's about where you want to be based on my memory from Anthony's best tunes.
Austin -- AFR's in the 16's are DANGEROUSLY lean... like, meltdown area. Don't do another WOT pull until you get your tune sorted out.
Re: datalogs LEAN AFR
I'm in the mid 12's mostly. My first tune was on a dyno and the target, which we hit, was 11.8. It's leaner now after more mods. Under 11 and I'd retune. Over 12.5 I'd retune. I'm on the borderline but I run 100 octane at the track. Well, realistically, about a 50/50 mix of 93 and 100.
Les
Les
You guys do realize that
<11 = rich
>12 = lean... right?
Jesse -- 9.6 AFR is a bit fat, you can lean that out and recoup some horsepower. If you're at ~10.9 under WOT at max boost, that's about where you want to be based on my memory from Anthony's best tunes.
Austin -- AFR's in the 16's are DANGEROUSLY lean... like, meltdown area. Don't do another WOT pull until you get your tune sorted out.
<11 = rich
>12 = lean... right?
Jesse -- 9.6 AFR is a bit fat, you can lean that out and recoup some horsepower. If you're at ~10.9 under WOT at max boost, that's about where you want to be based on my memory from Anthony's best tunes.
Austin -- AFR's in the 16's are DANGEROUSLY lean... like, meltdown area. Don't do another WOT pull until you get your tune sorted out.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Age: 39
Posts: 6,349
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
11 Posts
Re: datalogs LEAN AFR
Do you know who the original tuner is?
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Age: 39
Posts: 6,349
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
11 Posts
Re: datalogs LEAN AFR
I'm really shocked he's running as fat as he is, since he's running a bone-stock fuel system.
I thought surely I'd be playing with fire if I DIDN'T upgrade to at least bigger injectors... in retrospect, that might be why I ran so damn slow at the 1/2 mile
Re: datalogs LEAN AFR
My stock system is healthy also....pulled a little fuel to get the afr's good.
Re: datalogs LEAN AFR
[QUOTE=JHM2K;758826]You guys do realize that
<11 = rich
>12 = lean... right?
Jesse -- 9.6 AFR is a bit fat, you can lean that out and recoup some horsepower. If you're at ~10.9 under WOT at max boost, that's about where you want to be based on my memory from Anthony's best tunes.QUOTE]
Wow, I really messed this one up. You're right. So I am not lean according to the graphs, it is rich. Not a dangerous problem, just not ideal, right? Sooooo, I have room for more boost!
Tunaglove, thanks for pointing out that I need a baseline and to see if things are calibrated. I opend all the files back up and am consistently showing 14.7 AFR for normal crusing, ie. 15-20% TPS and around 2,000- 2,500 RPM.
I would like to get a reading on the IAT's, what is the best way to tie this into the wideband?
<11 = rich
>12 = lean... right?
Jesse -- 9.6 AFR is a bit fat, you can lean that out and recoup some horsepower. If you're at ~10.9 under WOT at max boost, that's about where you want to be based on my memory from Anthony's best tunes.QUOTE]
Wow, I really messed this one up. You're right. So I am not lean according to the graphs, it is rich. Not a dangerous problem, just not ideal, right? Sooooo, I have room for more boost!
Tunaglove, thanks for pointing out that I need a baseline and to see if things are calibrated. I opend all the files back up and am consistently showing 14.7 AFR for normal crusing, ie. 15-20% TPS and around 2,000- 2,500 RPM.
I would like to get a reading on the IAT's, what is the best way to tie this into the wideband?
Re: datalogs LEAN AFR
[QUOTE=JesseJamessrt6;758930]
using the dashdaq you can log iat thru it.
crap tune
no need to replace the inj. just need a decent tune. i ran 550 cc inj. stacked pulleys, sl55 fuel pump and 11.9 afr at wot. it was all in the tune running 5% lt/ft
cars dont fall out of tune unless you change your mods. tunes are updated due to weather conditions or power adders. if you tune for conditions and dont change anything the tune lasts forever
14.7 to 15 afr during a cruise is normal for closed loop driving. open loop ie: wot needs to be 11.8 to 12.2 . if the gauge is bad why trust it?
You guys do realize that
<11 = rich
>12 = lean... right?
Jesse -- 9.6 AFR is a bit fat, you can lean that out and recoup some horsepower. If you're at ~10.9 under WOT at max boost, that's about where you want to be based on my memory from Anthony's best tunes.QUOTE]
Wow, I really messed this one up. You're right. So I am not lean according to the graphs, it is rich. Not a dangerous problem, just not ideal, right? Sooooo, I have room for more boost!
running fat can be just as dangerous as running lean. you can wash down the cylinders causing a burn on the cylinder wall. 11.8 to 12.2 is were you want to be
Tunaglove, thanks for pointing out that I need a baseline and to see if things are calibrated. I opend all the files back up and am consistently showing 14.7 AFR for normal crusing, ie. 15-20% TPS and around 2,000- 2,500 RPM.
I would like to get a reading on the IAT's, what is the best way to tie this into the wideband?
<11 = rich
>12 = lean... right?
Jesse -- 9.6 AFR is a bit fat, you can lean that out and recoup some horsepower. If you're at ~10.9 under WOT at max boost, that's about where you want to be based on my memory from Anthony's best tunes.QUOTE]
Wow, I really messed this one up. You're right. So I am not lean according to the graphs, it is rich. Not a dangerous problem, just not ideal, right? Sooooo, I have room for more boost!
running fat can be just as dangerous as running lean. you can wash down the cylinders causing a burn on the cylinder wall. 11.8 to 12.2 is were you want to be
Tunaglove, thanks for pointing out that I need a baseline and to see if things are calibrated. I opend all the files back up and am consistently showing 14.7 AFR for normal crusing, ie. 15-20% TPS and around 2,000- 2,500 RPM.
I would like to get a reading on the IAT's, what is the best way to tie this into the wideband?
crap tune
Yes totally understand. Typo. I have been told that. Super dangerous. The engine is running super strong. I'm thinking its the sensor. The gauge is old. I have not seen it in the green. Its stays at 14.8. All the time even in WOT. I took the car to dealership they hooked it up to the computer and told me my o2 sensor were good. I totally confused about it. If you have experienced an AEM gauge I would appreciate the help.