Conical vs. Reverse Conical
Maybe some of you have had experience with both but conical shaped intakes are more widely used.
I'm starting to buy the parts for my intake and wanted to know if there is any difference (other than design) between the normal conical filter and a reverse conical filter. The difference is in the picture and it seems as though the reverse conical can directly take in air through the front (or top) of the filter possibly eliminating hotter air allowing more cool air into the intake.
So my question is, does anyone know of any gains by the different design. The description does tout more and better airflow due to the open top design whereas the universal conical one takes in air all around it rather than directly.
Conical
Reverse Conical
I'm starting to buy the parts for my intake and wanted to know if there is any difference (other than design) between the normal conical filter and a reverse conical filter. The difference is in the picture and it seems as though the reverse conical can directly take in air through the front (or top) of the filter possibly eliminating hotter air allowing more cool air into the intake.
So my question is, does anyone know of any gains by the different design. The description does tout more and better airflow due to the open top design whereas the universal conical one takes in air all around it rather than directly.
Conical
Reverse Conical
I think it's really close to the same cone filter but if I can direct air through the front grille (like the OEM intake is) directly into that hole, it might be better suited than pulling air directly from the engine bay like the cone filters do. I know there will be some air pulled by the engine bay but not as much as the typical cone.
For $20 more (well $40 since I'm getting 2) it's worth the shot.
For $20 more (well $40 since I'm getting 2) it's worth the shot.
if properly designed the reverse cone can help air flow properly into the intake path... for a good example look at apexi filters... that inner plastic cone can help intake flow by maintaining air velocity as the air does not slam into each other...
the K&N like design you have shown is merely for increased possible CFM (raw flow of air possible through the element) and will net gains IF the engine cannot flow enough CFM through the standard cone filter ... so on a forced induction application that needs more flow you will see a gain with the second filter likely but on a NA crossfire either one is fine and is nowhere near the best filter you can use on the car... either is better than the stock panel filters however.
look into apexi filters... will require more work to get them to fit though...
the K&N like design you have shown is merely for increased possible CFM (raw flow of air possible through the element) and will net gains IF the engine cannot flow enough CFM through the standard cone filter ... so on a forced induction application that needs more flow you will see a gain with the second filter likely but on a NA crossfire either one is fine and is nowhere near the best filter you can use on the car... either is better than the stock panel filters however.
look into apexi filters... will require more work to get them to fit though...
Originally Posted by intenseblu
if properly designed the reverse cone can help air flow properly into the intake path... for a good example look at apexi filters... that inner plastic cone can help intake flow by maintaining air velocity as the air does not slam into each other...
the K&N like design you have shown is merely for increased possible CFM (raw flow of air possible through the element) and will net gains IF the engine cannot flow enough CFM through the standard cone filter ... so on a forced induction application that needs more flow you will see a gain with the second filter likely but on a NA crossfire either one is fine and is nowhere near the best filter you can use on the car... either is better than the stock panel filters however.
look into apexi filters... will require more work to get them to fit though...
the K&N like design you have shown is merely for increased possible CFM (raw flow of air possible through the element) and will net gains IF the engine cannot flow enough CFM through the standard cone filter ... so on a forced induction application that needs more flow you will see a gain with the second filter likely but on a NA crossfire either one is fine and is nowhere near the best filter you can use on the car... either is better than the stock panel filters however.
look into apexi filters... will require more work to get them to fit though...
Last edited by GatorLCA; Mar 9, 2007 at 04:19 PM.
just buy this guys set up. https://www.crossfireforum.org/forum...236#post119236
Originally Posted by Maxwell
just buy this guys set up. https://www.crossfireforum.org/forum...236#post119236
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xfireohio
Cars For Sale - Archive
10
Jul 20, 2020 12:03 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)



