Audio, Video and Electronics Have audio, video or electronics questions? Post them in here.

Biggest stereo bang for the buck mod

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 03:29 AM
  #241 (permalink)  
xfireFL's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default Re: Biggest stereo bang for the buck mod

Originally Posted by batchain
I started with the 220uF caps and was not fully happy with it. last month I swapped them out for some 330uF ones which to me was a big improvement. A fuller, yet not too bassy sound from the fronts now.
I finally caught up on this thread (after more than 220+ posts) and I think I figured out, as some of you posted, why the front speakers sound "tinny" with the 220uF capacitor. It looks like everyone was assuming the front speakers were 4 Ohms vs 2 Ohms. All indications point to the fact that the front speakers are indeed 2 Ohms, thereby limiting the filter too high. A 220uF cap on a 4 Ohm speaker filters the bass at 181 Hz, whereas the same 220uF on a 2 Ohm speaker filters the bass at 362 Hz (much less bass is passed to the front, causing the "tinny" sound). Again, assuming the speakers are indeed rated at 2 Ohm, the 330uF will filter down to 241 Hz, meaning more bass is passed to the fronts, reducing the "tinny" sound.

I attached a chart to illustrate what I mean. If I am wrong, please correct me.
 
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
crossover.jpg (29.1 KB, 70 views)
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 04:20 AM
  #242 (permalink)  
Jack Shry's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Default Re: Biggest stereo bang for the buck mod

Originally Posted by xfireFL
I finally caught up on this thread (after more than 220+ posts) and I think I figured out, as some of you posted, why the front speakers sound "tinny" with the 220uF capacitor. It looks like everyone was assuming the front speakers were 4 Ohms vs 2 Ohms. All indications point to the fact that the front speakers are indeed 2 Ohms, thereby limiting the filter too high. A 220uF cap on a 4 Ohm speaker filters the bass at 181 Hz, whereas the same 220uF on a 2 Ohm speaker filters the bass at 362 Hz (much less bass is passed to the front, causing the "tinny" sound). Again, assuming the speakers are indeed rated at 2 Ohm, the 330uF will filter down to 241 Hz, meaning more bass is passed to the fronts, reducing the "tinny" sound.

I attached a chart to illustrate what I mean. If I am wrong, please correct me.
That has been my experience as well. The 330's permit much smoother sound at low volume levels. The Sub's still do their thing well.
Thanks for the research . . . Xfile owners can have a more positive audio and driving experience.
Jack
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 05:03 AM
  #243 (permalink)  
Stogey's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 1
From: Texas Hill Country
Default Re: Biggest stereo bang for the buck mod

I installed the 220's and got good results, but I believe I will swap to the 330's because of the low bass response in the doors. Thanks for the research !
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 12:10 PM
  #244 (permalink)  
xfireFL's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default Re: Biggest stereo bang for the buck mod

Originally Posted by Stogey
I installed the 220's and got good results, but I believe I will swap to the 330's because of the low bass response in the doors. Thanks for the research !
I JUST finished installing the 330s and WOW!!! I had a little difficulty finding non-polarized 330s, including a trip to the local radio shack and Circuit City. I finally found them at a small electronics parts store, however I went with the 65V instead of the 100V. The 100V were almost twice the size. Additionally, all they had was polarized. So, I bought two for each side and connectd them in series. I soldered the negative (-) connectors together and shrunk wrap them. That left the positive (+) ends free for the lead wires. Using my glue gun, I glued the two radial units together and then completed the wiring steps to make the leads. A quick solder of about 4 inches of lead wire and some shrink wrap around the connections, and all was done. It took me longer to prep the capacitors then to actually install them in the Xfire.

In all, it was well worth the time. The separation is incredible. I cranked it all the way to 40 with a Great White CD in the unit and it was so clean and tight. I actually dropped the bass down to +5 and the treble was so crisp, I dropped it to +4. What a difference!!! This is a must-do for anyone who is still using their Infinity stereo and wants a cheap, fast upgrade to TOTALLY enhance the sound.
 

Last edited by xfireFL; Dec 5, 2008 at 12:18 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 06:08 PM
  #245 (permalink)  
Maelstrom's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 67
Likes: 3
From: Pacific, WA
Default Re: Biggest stereo bang for the buck mod

Thanks for the great tip on this. I've read through this thread a couple times and just want to make sure I'm looking at the right capacitors. I've turned up a little luck at an audio shop.

http://www.nichicon.co.jp/english/products/pdf/e-kw.pdf

The ones I'm looking at are the 330uf 63v KW audio grade capacitors. These ARE polarized.

I understand the concept of what this mod does, I just do not understand all the tech specs for the capacitor to choose and if these will work in the Crossfire. I do not want to get the wrong ones and have a melt down.
Thanks
 

Last edited by Maelstrom; Dec 22, 2008 at 06:27 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 07:34 PM
  #246 (permalink)  
maxcichon's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 8,015
Likes: 14
From: MOFN, AL, 70 miles from George
Default Re: Biggest stereo bang for the buck mod

I did a bit of experimentation on this and found these:

http://www.newark.com/united-chemi-c...tor/dp/16M7455

To provide the best all-around performance.
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 08:30 PM
  #247 (permalink)  
Cal_Cobra's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Brentwood, CA (no not the OJ Simpson Brentwood, the real city of Brentwood in NorCal)
Default Re: Biggest stereo bang for the buck mod

The factory stereo system is definitely 2 ohms as I originally stated a few posts ago. If you look at the factory wiring diagram for the amps/speakers their clearly marked as 2 ohms.

I tried to find 330 (or close) caps at Frys and no luck, so the hunt continues for appropriate caps.

Happy Holidays,
Brian
 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 09:06 AM
  #248 (permalink)  
Veloce's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 465
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio - Republic of Texas (ROT)
Default Re: Biggest stereo bang for the buck mod

Where do these from Crutchfield fit in to the scheme of things?


Bass Blockers

Pairs (150 Hz cut-off)

IN STOCK
  • Handles up to 50 watts RMS
  • 6 dB per octave roll-off
They have several others and, since I'm electronics deprived, the cut-off description has me further confused.
 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 10:19 PM
  #249 (permalink)  
Cal_Cobra's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Brentwood, CA (no not the OJ Simpson Brentwood, the real city of Brentwood in NorCal)
Default Re: Biggest stereo bang for the buck mod

Originally Posted by Veloce
Where do these from Crutchfield fit in to the scheme of things?


Bass Blockers

Pairs (150 Hz cut-off)

IN STOCK
  • Handles up to 50 watts RMS
  • 6 dB per octave roll-off
They have several others and, since I'm electronics deprived, the cut-off description has me further confused.

Their most likely made for 4ohm systems. You'd need to figure out what the specs on the caps are to know what their cut-off is for a 2ohm setup (probably 300 Hz).
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 05:39 AM
  #250 (permalink)  
Veloce's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 465
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio - Republic of Texas (ROT)
Default Re: Biggest stereo bang for the buck mod

Crutchfield says, the cut-off points are 150Hz with a 4 ohm speaker and 75 Hz if you use 8-ohm speakers. Am I too assume that the cut-off is 300Hz if used on our 2 ohm system? And, if so, is this the same as 300 uf as discussed in the thread?

From Crutchfield:

If you like it loud, protect your speakers from bass distortion and enjoy cleaner sound with Bass Blockers. Each Bass Blocker handles up to 50 watts RMS with a 6 dB per octave roll-off. You'll find some general guidelines below for matching Bass Blockers to speaker size. For smaller speakers (3-1/2"s, 4"x6"s, 4"s), the 600 Hz Bass Blockers work well with low-powered systems, while the 800 Hz Blockers are a better choice for high-power applications.
Speaker Size Cut-off Frequency
Read More

6-1/2", 5"x7"/6"x8" — 150 Hz
5", 5-1/4" — 300 Hz
3-1/2", 4", 4"x6" — 600 Hz (low power)
3-1/2", 4", 4"x6" — 800 Hz (high power)
These models come fitted with easy-to-use quick-slide connectors that make installation a cinch. There's no splicing or crimping — just slide one of the Bass Blocker's connectors onto your Crutchfield speaker harness and the other Bass Blocker connector onto your speaker's positive terminal.
Cut-off points are at 4 ohms. If you use 8-ohm speakers, is the cut-off point is twice that?

 

Last edited by Veloce; Dec 27, 2008 at 08:48 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2008 | 07:07 PM
  #251 (permalink)  
shackman's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Default Re: Biggest stereo bang for the buck mod

I have a new 08 crossfire and the only disappointment is with the radio. I am so great full for this information because I was about to do a total change out. I will let you know how I think it sounds. Thanks !
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2009 | 09:59 AM
  #252 (permalink)  
shackman's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Default Re: Biggest stereo bang for the buck mod

I purchased the 200uf, 100v capacitor from Amazon.com and installed both caps in about one hour. The system sounds great. Thanks for the info. Walter https://www.crossfireforum.org/forum.../icon_razz.gif
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 09:14 AM
  #253 (permalink)  
InfernoRedXfire's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,951
Likes: 9
From: Dallas, the Republic of Texas
Default Re: Biggest stereo bang for the buck mod

I did this mod over the summer. Now, the entire drivers side speakers are not working. Well, they BARELY work with the volumn cranked way up.

Any ideas on what the problem could be?
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 09:31 AM
  #254 (permalink)  
aschrager's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 881
Likes: 3
From: The Villages, Florida
Default Re: Biggest stereo bang for the buck mod

Check the balance adjustment.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 09:47 AM
  #255 (permalink)  
InfernoRedXfire's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,951
Likes: 9
From: Dallas, the Republic of Texas
Default Re: Biggest stereo bang for the buck mod

Originally Posted by aschrager
Check the balance adjustment.
That's the first thing I did. I turned it all the way to the drivers side only and turned the volume way up. That's how I know it puts out a just a little bit of sound.

I also changed radio stations and ran a CD. It's the same on both.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 09:52 AM
  #256 (permalink)  
BLKFIN's Avatar
ADDICTED TO BOOST
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 1
From: McKinney, TX
Default Re: Biggest stereo bang for the buck mod

Originally Posted by InfernoRedXfire
That's the first thing I did. I turned it all the way to the drivers side only and turned the volume way up. That's how I know it puts out a just a little bit of sound.

I also changed radio stations and ran a CD. It's the same on both.
You may have blown the cap or a wire has come loose. Take a look at the cap and see what it looks like. Sometimes, when they go bad, the ends will "swell".
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 09:54 AM
  #257 (permalink)  
aschrager's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 881
Likes: 3
From: The Villages, Florida
Default Re: Biggest stereo bang for the buck mod

My amp went bad when I had my xfire for a short time. But both sides were low. Could be the amp or head unit. I got the amp replaced under warranty.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 09:56 AM
  #258 (permalink)  
BLKFIN's Avatar
ADDICTED TO BOOST
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 1
From: McKinney, TX
Default Re: Biggest stereo bang for the buck mod

Inferno,

I have an extra Head Unit we can switch it out or take the one out of your wifes car to test that. I have the little keys to remove the Head Units and that would take 5 minutes to do~
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 10:04 AM
  #259 (permalink)  
maxcichon's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 8,015
Likes: 14
From: MOFN, AL, 70 miles from George
Default Re: Biggest stereo bang for the buck mod

Remove the capacitor. Try it again?
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 10:23 AM
  #260 (permalink)  
InfernoRedXfire's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,951
Likes: 9
From: Dallas, the Republic of Texas
Default Re: Biggest stereo bang for the buck mod

Yeh, I'm suspecting it's probably the head unit.

I don't think the speaker wires in the door would effect the rear speaker.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:53 AM.