Crossfire Coupe A place to discuss Coupe specific topics.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Crossfire 2.0

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 1, 2009 | 09:27 PM
  #61 (permalink)  
Mr. Max's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 916
Likes: 1
From: Pasadena California
Default Re: Crossfire 2.0

Eric, I've heard the name comes from the lines. I've also heard the name comes from the marriage of Chrysler and Daimler. Lastly, I've heard the name came from both of those things. Which is it? 1,2,or3

Thanks!
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2009 | 09:32 PM
  #62 (permalink)  
Franc Rauscher's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,511
Likes: 1,149
From: St Louis MO
Default Re: Crossfire 2.0

Eric,

Any thoughts on using the Genesis platform, shortened and made into a 2 seater?

I swear, strakes, SSB color and a spine, that puppy would pass for a Crossfire.

franc
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2009 | 09:40 PM
  #63 (permalink)  
Creator's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Honorary -C-I-C-C-I Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Default Re: Crossfire 2.0

Originally Posted by Mr. Max
Eric, I've heard the name comes from the lines. I've also heard the name comes from the marriage of Chrysler and Daimler. Lastly, I've heard the name came from both of those things. Which is it? 1,2,or3

Thanks!
Answer #1 is correct. Don Renkert came up with the name because of the crossing of the lines on the bodyside. When we were developing the original concept there was no intention of using a Mercedes chassis.
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2009 | 09:41 PM
  #64 (permalink)  
Creator's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Honorary -C-I-C-C-I Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Default Re: Crossfire 2.0

Originally Posted by Franc Rauscher
Eric,

Any thoughts on using the Genesis platform, shortened and made into a 2 seater?

I swear, strakes, SSB color and a spine, that puppy would pass for a Crossfire.

franc
Not unless you want it made in Korea! Let's keep this thing 'Merican!
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2009 | 10:10 PM
  #65 (permalink)  
Mr. Max's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 916
Likes: 1
From: Pasadena California
Default Re: Crossfire 2.0

Originally Posted by Creator
Answer #1 is correct. Don Renkert came up with the name because of the crossing of the lines on the bodyside. When we were developing the original concept there was no intention of using a Mercedes chassis.
Thanks Eric, now I know, and I just hope someone argues with me about it so I can tell them my source.
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2009 | 10:30 PM
  #66 (permalink)  
Franc Rauscher's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,511
Likes: 1,149
From: St Louis MO
Default Re: Crossfire 2.0

Originally Posted by Creator
Not unless you want it made in Korea! Let's keep this thing 'Merican!
I do like the sound of that. Still, with all the intermix of components in cars these days, nothing is truly Korean, German or American, even when it's is produced in Brazil, Lima Peru or Lima Ohio.

That said, OK what in America looks good to you? Chrysler stuff?

franc
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 03:44 PM
  #67 (permalink)  
Jeff Cobb's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
From: Western NC
Default Re: Crossfire 2.0

The new Chrysler 200C concept car looks pretty cool, and it is based on a shortened 300C platform.
 
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
200c-1.jpg (251.0 KB, 32 views)
File Type: bmp
200c-2.bmp (487.8 KB, 65 views)
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 04:29 PM
  #68 (permalink)  
Mr. Max's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 916
Likes: 1
From: Pasadena California
Default Re: Crossfire 2.0

Originally Posted by Jeff Cobb
The new Chrysler 200C concept car looks pretty cool, and it is based on a shortened 300C platform.
Definitely Crossfiresque. Obviously Chrysler still has their style sense.
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 04:38 PM
  #69 (permalink)  
MikeR's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,180
Likes: 13
From: North Plains, OR
Default Re: Crossfire 2.0

Yeah.. if you pushed the seats and windshield to the back and only two doors it would be VERY Crossfire-ish..
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 05:23 PM
  #70 (permalink)  
Jeff Cobb's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
From: Western NC
Default Re: Crossfire 2.0

When I saw the 200C, it made me think that in some Chrysler board meeting somebody asked what was wrong with the Sebring, and the answer was . . . "it's not a Crossfire."
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 05:34 PM
  #71 (permalink)  
Mr. Max's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 916
Likes: 1
From: Pasadena California
Default Re: Crossfire 2.0

Originally Posted by Jeff Cobb
When I saw the 200C, it made me think that in some Chrysler board meeting somebody asked what was wrong with the Sebring, and the answer was . . . "it's not a Crossfire."
Judging from the financial hit Chrysler took on our great little cars, they may referring to it as the C word or not referring to it at all.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 07:34 AM
  #72 (permalink)  
+fireamx's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,509
Likes: 7
From: Akron, Ohio
Default Re: Crossfire 2.0

I saw the Creators new HYUNDAI "Genesis" coupe at the Cleveland Auto show. I must say I was very impressed and it was the only car I sat in.
I always did kind of like the old Tiburons too, especially after they changed the front ends. (Did Eric have anything to do with that?)
Never thought I'd say this about a Hyundai, but I may seriously consider the Genesis as my next everyday driver. I do wish they would have put the sedans V8 in it though.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 08:05 AM
  #73 (permalink)  
patpur's Avatar
Senior Member/Moderator
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 1
From: Brookeville, Maryland
Default Re: Crossfire 2.0

Thought I read in Motor Trend it was supposed to have a V-8 ?
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 08:17 AM
  #74 (permalink)  
patpur's Avatar
Senior Member/Moderator
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 1
From: Brookeville, Maryland
Default Re: Crossfire 2.0

Thanks for the explanation Eric, very interesting, fills in the blanks for me.
When I was about 12 years old I got a drafting table and some drafting instruments for Christmas, I loved to draw. My uncle was an architect/acoustic engineer and he and my dad figured they'd try and encourage my drawing talents. So I guess I figured I should start designing cars. I'd been a car nut since I could walk and my grandfather was a Chrysler/Dodge/Imperial dealer. So I spent one snowy, home from school morning, looking through car magazines for ideas, back then it was Car Craft, Hot Rod and Motor Trend and I came up with a sketch that looked alarmingly like the Ford Pinto. Hey I'm 12! SO I send it off to Ford for a response. Heck I thought I'd done something great. What I get back from Ford was a Cease and Desist letter. Seems my "design" was a little too close to a Pinto. That was the last time I tried to "design" anything.
Love your designs, keep them coming!
Pat
 

Last edited by patpur; Mar 3, 2009 at 12:43 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 12:39 PM
  #75 (permalink)  
Mr. Max's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 916
Likes: 1
From: Pasadena California
Default Re: Crossfire 2.0

Originally Posted by patpur
Thanks for the explanation Eric, very interesting, fills in the blanks for me.
When I was about 12 years old I got a drafting table and some drafting instruments for Christmas, I loved to draw. My uncle was a draftsman and so he and my dad figured they'd try and encourage my drawing talents. So I guess I figured I should start designing cars. My grandfather was a Chrysler/Dodge/Imperial dealer. So I spent one snowy, home from school morning looking through car magazines, back then it was Car Craft, Hot Rod and Motor Trend and I came up with a sketch that looked alarmingly like the Ford Pinto. Hey I'm 12! SO I send it off to Ford for a response. I think probably like any 12 year would that I'd done something great. What I get back from Ford was a Cease and Desist letter. Seems my "design" was a little to close to a Pinto. That was the last time I tried to "design" anything.
Love your designs, keep them coming!
Pat
Considering the number of deaths that resulted from Pinto Gas tanks exploding, They probably wished they had used your design lol
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 09:26 PM
  #76 (permalink)  
steverwrx's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 225
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default Re: Crossfire 2.0

Originally Posted by Creator
.......... Working with Savitch we built the full size clay in about 4 months and shipped it off to Metalcrafters.........
I worked at Metalcrafters for five years and was there when the Crossfire was built. Still my most favorite concept car

It is so very cool that Eric in on this site.
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 11:23 AM
  #77 (permalink)  
rodimus's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 1
From: NY/NJ
Default Re: Crossfire 2.0

Could this actually happen or is this just fantasy?

Or would it end up the Hyundai Crossfire or Firepower?


Did you have any input on the Firepower?




Sorry if this was covered already......
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 04:04 PM
  #78 (permalink)  
Creator's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Honorary -C-I-C-C-I Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Default Re: Crossfire 2.0

Originally Posted by rodimus
Could this actually happen or is this just fantasy?

Or would it end up the Hyundai Crossfire or Firepower?


Did you have any input on the Firepower?




Sorry if this was covered already......
No, Xfire 2.0 is just a 'What if'....It's fun to think about what could happen if Chrysler weren't in this mess. Anything is possible, though. Maybe we can get some investors together and build it!

The Firepower was actually designed by Brian Nielander, after I had already left the company. Brian and I were interns together and we both started at Chrysler within a few weeks of each other. Last I heard he was still at Chrysler as a design manager.
 
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 07:16 AM
  #79 (permalink)  
rodimus's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 1
From: NY/NJ
Default Re: Crossfire 2.0

Originally Posted by Creator
No, Xfire 2.0 is just a 'What if'....It's fun to think about what could happen if Chrysler weren't in this mess. Anything is possible, though. Maybe we can get some investors together and build it!

The Firepower was actually designed by Brian Nielander, after I had already left the company. Brian and I were interns together and we both started at Chrysler within a few weeks of each other. Last I heard he was still at Chrysler as a design manager.

That would be cool if we could get 2.0 privately built.

Talk about rare!!
 
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 08:50 AM
  #80 (permalink)  
InfernoRedXfire's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,951
Likes: 9
From: Dallas, the Republic of Texas
Default Re: Crossfire 2.0

Originally Posted by Creator
The idea was to continue the center spine from the hood into the windshield, to form a unique cowl shape that's reminiscent of the old split windshields, without the split.
Eric, why was the spline through the windshield of the Crossifre eleminated? Was it due to some NHTSA safety requirement?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:20 AM.