Engine Died at High Speed
Thank you.
My explanation would have been similar. As the throttle backed off, the injectors shut down. System went lean and the ECM shut it down. Or the engine starved. Given the over the ground speed, the ECU said abort.
Same thing could happen to a totaly mehanical carbuerated engine.
One other possibility would be an over rev situation where he pushed in on the clutch, left his other foot on the throttle, the engine over rev'd to the limiter, and the engine shut down. Depending on what the driver did with the throttle it stayed that way.
My explanation would have been similar. As the throttle backed off, the injectors shut down. System went lean and the ECM shut it down. Or the engine starved. Given the over the ground speed, the ECU said abort.
Same thing could happen to a totaly mehanical carbuerated engine.
One other possibility would be an over rev situation where he pushed in on the clutch, left his other foot on the throttle, the engine over rev'd to the limiter, and the engine shut down. Depending on what the driver did with the throttle it stayed that way.
And I am waiting for you to understand the obvious.
But then, You have never driven a car at those speeds, or pushed and engine that hard,,,, have you?
Engineering is done in the comfort of the office. Real world tends to be differ't.
That's why Bridges sometimes fall down.
And engines blow up.
And the engineers learn.
I cannot take any credit for the concept. A Tuner here in town who races minis suggested the idea. I say it seems logical.
Last edited by Franc Rauscher; Feb 27, 2014 at 08:26 PM.
I've been dealing with consulting engineers who have never actually worked on the systems I deploy. I can't tell them a damn thing.
And the engineers learn.
I was an installer for years. Been there.
And I am waiting for you to understand the obvious.
But then, You have never driven a car at those speeds, or pushed and engine that hard,,,, have you?
Engineering is done in the comfort of the office. Real world tends to be differ't.
That's why Bridges sometimes fall down.
And engines blow up.
And the engineers learn.
I cannot take any credit for the concept. A Tuner here in town who races minis suggested the idea. I say it seems logical.
But then, You have never driven a car at those speeds, or pushed and engine that hard,,,, have you?
Engineering is done in the comfort of the office. Real world tends to be differ't.
That's why Bridges sometimes fall down.
And engines blow up.
And the engineers learn.
I cannot take any credit for the concept. A Tuner here in town who races minis suggested the idea. I say it seems logical.
Please explain it to me with pictures if possible.
The one piece we are missing is whether a tuner had been in there. My owner's manual calls for Z-rated tires (149 mph) so at 144 the speed limiter should not have kicked in with the factory program. OTOH if that was read from the speedo, who knows what the computer thought the speed was. Have not seen a disassembly but in my GM computers there is a fuel cut off speed and a turn back on about 5 mph lower.
Also there is " The traction control indicator turned on and the color was orange (not yellow). All other warning lights came on while the car was in-gear." but no CEL or codes ? That sure sounds like the computer crashed and reset when started.
ps Have been at or over that speed many times (used to race Corvettes). Am more concerned about tach, oil, and temp than speedo.
Also there is " The traction control indicator turned on and the color was orange (not yellow). All other warning lights came on while the car was in-gear." but no CEL or codes ? That sure sounds like the computer crashed and reset when started.
ps Have been at or over that speed many times (used to race Corvettes). Am more concerned about tach, oil, and temp than speedo.
Last edited by Padgett; Feb 28, 2014 at 08:37 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ricardo 53
Cars For Sale - Archive
0
Jul 21, 2015 07:49 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)



